![ejabberd sucks ejabberd sucks](https://i.imgur.com/gOzbvCw.jpg)
In fact, I used to run exchange 5.5, and the only thing that pisses me off about the newer exchanges is ADS integration, I dislike Microsoft ADS, but do not dislike exchange. Sure, piles of files is nice, particularly mbox or completely uncontained, like how OpenMAIL used to do it, but Exchange has become faster and more stable. I’ve run mail servers and never had had the desire to care about how the data is stored if it isn’t in files. – ESE caches data intelligently to ensure high performance access to dataĪnd exchange server with enough memory can spit back searches like lightning.Īlso, Exchange implements single instance storage, if you mail everyone on the server a huge file they all get a pointer to a single instance.
![ejabberd sucks ejabberd sucks](http://bradfitz.com/talks/2011-09-Djangocon/img/use-contributing.png)
– Transactions in ESE are highly concurrent making ESE suitable for server applications – A crash recovery mechanism is provided so that data consistency is maintained even in the event of a system crash
Ejabberd sucks update#
– ESE allows applications to enjoy a consistent data state via transacted data update and retrieval – Purpose is to allow applications to store and retrieve data via indexed and sequential access – Indexed Sequential Access Method (ISAM) Jet Blue or ESE or Extensible Storage Engine is what is in Exchange. Jet Red is the junk you think is in exchange, but you are wrong. One Jet is for junk like Access, the other basically does everything SQL can do without SQL queries, and why the hell do you want to run SQL queries against a message store? Its not like tweaking MSSQL will be any easier. People talk about Jet don’t know about the two versions of Jet. Message me or something if you ever want to talk.Ok, I ran Openmail (Now Scalix), run Dovecot and WU, and run Sun Communications Suite and have dallied in OSER, Communigate, etc.īy no means am I a Microsoft fan, and yes, I do run a few Exchange Servers.īut this garbage about Jet is ridiculous. Don’t take this the wrong way, you’re just annoying me more than you’re making me happy knowing about your life by having you on Facebook. So what am I going to do? Pretty simple and to the point, if your constant updates and feeds annoy me, I’m going to politely remove you off my Facebook profile. I could turn off all this sort of stuff by filtering most of it out, but, then again, (1) I can not be bothered setting up this stuff for every annoying feed type, and (2) I really do not care about this stuff (and most of the time, the people behind this stuff). I dont know who just played poker, I dont know who went to I dont know what event, someone just got bitten-axed-limbs-torn-up by I dont know who… That’s just silly. So whats the deal with people on Facebook having 65543 friends and whatnot? Well maybe not that much, but still, having a lot of friends.I have 61 friends, and I’m overwhelmed with all sorts of annoying feeds here and there and every-effin-where. The next major hurdle to jump over is going to be zooming in and out pretty fast (a problem that might be solved using mipmaps, but might require OpenGL, something I’m trying to avoid).UPDATE: Video here. Some of the major challenges at this point are being able to handle the vast amount of data thrown at the application, scrolling it around, loading / unloading images, etc. Right now, I’ve implemented the kinetic panning area, an LRU multi-layered cache system for the images, and the (huge) image grid widget that will hold those thousands and thousands of images. You can then zoom in and out, and pan around, until you find your target image, at which point you can pick it up and use it. So, naturally, you’d go to the blue area, use your mouse wheel to start zooming in and out, and “throw” the images around (using a kinetic energy panning approach) until you start finding something that resembles the image you’re looking for. The end result is a big map of all your images, zoomed out, such that every corner of the image represents a color, and the closer you move from one corner to another, you see the colors converging into a gradient. How can you go about looking for it? You fire up Finder, let it loose on your system, and ask it to cluster images by color. Say you want to find an image on your system you know its mainly blue (of some sky), but you don’t remember its name, size, location, or when you got it. For lack of a better name, it’s called Finder for now. I’ve been working on a new concept for an image viewing / searching application.